Way to go Wal-Mart...discrimination against women, environmental degradation, sweatshop labor, and illegal immigrants weren't enough...they've decided to shop for votes as well! Apply for employment at participating Wal-Mart stores, and they'll pay you 25% more than the usual going rate to cast your vote against reduced big box stores! Brilliant!
posted by Jenny at 1:58 AM |
Hesiod's recent post castigating Ralph Nader invited a slough of comments from all sides of the issue...as a Green supporter and a US citizen living in Europe, I feel that Hesiod's argument is somewhat simplified. As a matter of fact, I also think that the Dem-hating rhetoric of many Greens is also rather one-dimensional...although I share their frustration and desire for change.
This time around, I am torn between several choices with my vote (first of all assuming my vote really matters--if it doesn't, I'm just going to consider my trip to the polls an act of revolutionary parody)...Ralph Nader is really not my first choice for a presidential candidate, although the Green party certainly is--as some critics argue, Nader distances himself from the actual party leadership while fostering an image that he is invaluabe to their cause. If I decide to vote Democrat this time around, I have to see what pickings the primaries have left us with...and I really don't trust any of them fully, except for those like Kucinich at whom the mainstream scoffs.
In reality, I feel like the best chance for the survival of the United States's political integrity and cohesiveness (or rather, the scraps of which remain) is to progress towards a multi-party system, in which groups like the Democrats and Greens form coalition governments and run along common issues. In a situation like this, with a rabid group of neocons in power, we've got to do all we can to pull our fat out of the fire--but we have also got to pay careful attention to the ways in which we accomplish this. I would almost argue that working toward a coalition government is more important than campaigning for Democrats in an act of desperation, regardless of how desperate we truly are, because keeping things in the two party system will only continue the dishonesty and disproportional representation we've been dealing with in the past...
But I tend to ramble, and what I really wanted to do was ask what you guys think--is there a chance in hell that a coalition between Greens and Dems is possible, either before 2004 or after? Would it even be a good idea from your perspective? From where I'm sitting, only a handful of people see this as a possibility...but I really think it would make a critical difference in the way things turn out in future elections. So...get ready to click the comments button!
posted by Jenny at 1:32 AM |